The Value of CoC Detection in Woven Assessments

Shayna Pittman Updated by Shayna Pittman

The Value of Code of Conduct (CoC) Detection in Woven Assessments

While CoC detection systems aren't perfect, they're crucial for maintaining assessment integrity, especially for entry-level hiring. The alternative is accepting significantly compromised assessment validity and reliability.

Prevalence of AI Tool Usage

  • Approximately 30% of entry-level candidates engage in immediate copy/paste behavior with AI tools like ChatGPT within the first 2 minutes
  • These candidates typically score above average on assessments
  • Without CoC detection, top-scoring candidate pools become significantly skewed toward those using unauthorized assistance

Pattern Recognition in Suspicious Behavior where we can identify common red flags:

Timeline Anomalies
  • Even experienced fast readers typically require 3+ minutes just to skim and orient themselves with the prompt and codebase
  • Unrealistic speed in problem comprehension and solution implementation
Suspicious Behavior Patterns
  1. Copying prompt text into external IDE
  2. Transferring to AI tool
  3. ~15 second pause (typical AI response time)
  4. Perfect top-to-bottom solution implementation with no iteration or backtracking
Alternative Cheating Methods
  • Solution sharing among college students through personal networks
  • Pre-written answers from previous test-takers
  • Direct transcription from unauthorized sources
Statistical Significance
  • In cases with patterns matching the example case, the probability of legitimate completion is less than 0.01%
  • Entry-level applications combined with pre-interview stage increase CoC violation rates by approximately 6x compared to typical scenarios

Appeal Process and False Positives

Appeal System Necessity
  • Process maintains fairness while acknowledging potential errors
  • Most common legitimate explanation: Prior exposure to assessment content
  • Previous completion of similar assessments can mirror cheating patterns
Risk Management

If CoC detection is removed:

  • Signal quality and predictiveness will significantly decrease
  • Particularly impacts assessment validity for:
    1. Entry-level applications
    2. Pre-interview stage candidates

Impact on Hiring Process

Without CoC Detection
  • Top-scoring candidate pools become predominantly composed of AI-assisted submissions
  • Interview performance shows significant disparity with assessment scores
  • Reduces reliability of technical assessment as a screening tool
With CoC Detection
  • More accurate representation of candidate capabilities
  • Better correlation between assessment and interview performance
  • Maintains integrity of hiring pipeline

How did we do?

Github Pull Request (Code) Review: Candidate Submitted No Solution

Trade-offs Between AI Programming Assistant use in Assessments

Contact