Candidates
Why Woven Enforces Unique Candidate Links
ADA Accommodations for Candidates
Getting Started with Woven
How to Create a Support Ticket
How To See/Change Available Languages For A Scenario
Candidates who have previously take a Woven Assessment
Candidate Feedback FAQ
Tips for Maximizing Candidate Completion Rate
Scoring Quality Assurance
Pair programming with a candidate's solution
Downloading a candidate's code from a recommendation
Locating rejected, withdrawn or hired candidates in Woven
Free Trial
Integrations
Woven customer email address: security and access controls
One Click Candidate Invites to Woven
MacOS: Open generated candidate invite emails by configuring gmail as your email client for mailto
Integrating Greenhouse with Woven
Internal
Roles & Work Simulations
Scenario Timeboxing and Time Limits FAQ
How to Create a Role
Woven and ChatGPT resistance
NEW Role Creation UI
Woven Scoring System and Philosophy
What does a score of 100 mean in Woven?
Increasing Scenario Time Limits
How to Clone a Role
Rubric Change Logs
Data Architecture - Schema/Model
Hard SQL: Two Lawyers Who Worked in the Most Trials Together
Architecture Debugging - Brainstorm
Security & Privacy
- All Categories
- Rubric Change Logs
- Hard SQL: Two Lawyers Who Worked in the Most Trials Together
Hard SQL: Two Lawyers Who Worked in the Most Trials Together
3/28/23
In an effort to address feedback that the “Two Lawyers” SQL scenario was attaining high scores for only minimal solutions, we’ve adjusted the rubric such that there are now three items that track the progress the candidate makes in the sub-tasks.
- Determined all pairs of attorneys who have worked together on cases (0-2 scale)
- Identified pair of lawyers with highest number of cases worked together (0-2 scale)
- Gathered all trials associated with pair of lawyers with highest number of cases worked together (0-2 scale)
Each of the above items has a 0-2 where “1” means the candidate made an attempt at the subtask, and “2” means the candidate got it correct. Other changes include a re-weighting of existing rubric items, including reducing the weight for lesser tasks like commenting and string concatenation.